Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Altmaier vs Jesper De Jong Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Altmaier vs Jong analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Altmaier vs Jesper De Jong Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Altmaier 1 - 0 Jong
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Altmaier has won 49.02% of points on their second serve, while Jong has won 49.91%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Altmaier, in recent form, has won 46.06% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jong has won 50.64%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.19% and 32.68% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Altmaier has saved 57.3% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jong has saved 61.54% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Altmaier has won 39.29% of matches played (W/L 22/ 34), with Jong winning 59.65% (W/L 34/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Altmaier has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 126/ 73), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 35% (W/L 7/ 13). Jong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 80/ 37), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Altmaier has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 37.04% of matches (W/L 10/ 17), where as Jong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.61% of matches (W/L 20/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Altmaier winning 1 times and Jong being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Altmaier winning 2 and Jong winning 1. The last match between Altmaier and Jong was at the Guayaquil Challenger, 04-11-2022, Quarterfinals, Clay with Daniel Altmaier getting the victory 6-2 3-6 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:8:16.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Altmaier and Jong have played a deciding set 1 times, with Altmaier winning 1 times and Jong 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Altmaier winning 0, and Jong 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Altmaier has played against opponents with an average rank of 182.8 while Jong has played against players with an average rank of 318.49.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Altmaier has won 38% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jong has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Altmaier has converted 40.13% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jong has converted 47.66% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
83
Rank
47
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
176
Rank
135
High
24
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
61% (370-238)
Career Total W/L
63% (225-135)
37% (10-17)
YTD W/L
60% (21-14)
$1,210,200
Career Prize Money
$430,415
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Daniel Altmaier | Jesper De Jong |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:8:16 | 2:8:16 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (53/83) | 65% (51/78) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 83% (44/53) | 63% (32/51) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (14/30) | 70% (19/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (3/9) | 9% (1/11) |
| Return Points W% | 35% (27/78) | 30% (25/83) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 3-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Jesper De Jong
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
5
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
0
83%
(
44 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
30%
(
25 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Altmaier | Jesper De Jong |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 37% (10/17) | 60% (21/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 39% (26/40) | 56% (49/38) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (315/346) | 53% (431/384) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) | 70% (7/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 31% (5/11) | 61% (14/9) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.37 | 0.45 |
| Aces Total | 121 | 179 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 61 | 99 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:2:11 | 1:55:46 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 199.89 | 316.11 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1337/2106) | 59% (1549/2639) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (908/1337) | 71% (1094/1549) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (377/769) | 50% (544/1090) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (63/157) | 48% (112/235) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (737/2063) | 40% (1014/2544) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 80% (8/2) |
| Masters W/L | 40% (4/6) | 50% (1/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 38% (5/8) | 0% (0/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 57% (12/9) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (9/24) | 59% (17/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 60% (3/5) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 47% (7/15) | 55% (6/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 50% (5/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 82% (11/9) | 95% (19/18) |
| 1st set W, L | 18% (11/2) | 5% (19/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 6% (16/1) | 19% (16/3) |
Daniel Altmaier Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Daniel Altmaier
64%
(
74 of
116)
1st Serve %
63%
(
67 of
106)
7
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
51 of
67)
69%
(
29 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
33 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
36 of
106)
119
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 6-2 6-7(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Laslo Djere
67%
(
122 of
183)
1st Serve %
63%
(
137 of
217)
11
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
6
73%
(
89 of
122)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
95 of
137)
52%
(
32 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
34%
(
62 of
183)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
84 of
217)
205
Total Points Won
195
|
7-5 6-4 6-7(6) 5-7 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Carballes Baena
Player
Daniel Altmaier
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
44%
(
34 of
78)
0
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
24 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Nardi
Player
Daniel Altmaier
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
79%
(
42 of
53)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Daniel Altmaier
48%
(
35 of
73)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
87)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
47%
(
34 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
79
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Daniel Altmaier
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Arthur Fils
84%
(
42 of
50)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
7
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Martin Landaluce
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Fils
Player
Daniel Altmaier
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Alexei Popyrin
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
52%
(
36 of
69)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
19 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Jesper De Jong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Jesper De Jong
70%
(
78 of
112)
1st Serve %
58%
(
72 of
124)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
40%
(
45 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
61 of
124)
128
Total Points Won
108
|
6-3 6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Jack Draper
50%
(
77 of
154)
1st Serve %
50%
(
75 of
149)
11
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
9
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
51 of
75)
52%
(
40 of
77)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
90%
(
9 of
10)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
37%
(
57 of
154)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
60 of
149)
157
Total Points Won
146
|
7-5 6-4 6-7(3) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Jeff Wolf
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
41%
(
18 of
44)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Dennis Novak
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
54%
(
45 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
101)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
33 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
101)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Jesper De Jong
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
49%
(
45 of
92)
8
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
3
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
36 of
45)
59%
(
27 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
31 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
92)
100
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Jesper De Jong
49%
(
42 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
70%
(
30 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
26 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
98)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Jurij Rodionov
54%
(
58 of
107)
1st Serve %
45%
(
40 of
89)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
51%
(
25 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
47 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
99
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Jesper De Jong
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Francesco Passaro
65%
(
68 of
104)
1st Serve %
75%
(
81 of
108)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
53 of
68)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
49 of
81)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
35 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
108)
111
Total Points Won
101
|
6-3 6-7(2) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
view more
Altmaier Vs Jong Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
